Able to view notes owned by other accounts
This looks like a duplicate of r_6y9btspn6v. Same vulnerability class and primary component as r_6y9btspn6v (similarity 0.93), which was already accepted. Confirm before voiding the deposit.
- Suggested severity
- medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (6.5)
- Claimed severity
- —
- Vulnerability class
- CWE-639
- Triage
- 12 s · claude-opus-5-5 (live)
Duplicate of r_6y9btspn6v
- Step 1 done
Read the claims
CWE-639 in 1.4.03.4 s - Step 2 done
Version in scope
0 msPass: Version 1.4.0 is in scope
The project has 1.4.0.
- Step 3 done
Cited code exists
1 msPass: File src/notes.ts exists in 1.4.0
The cited file is present at this version.
- Step 4 done
Not a duplicate
2.3 sDuplicate: Duplicate of r_6y9btspn6v
Similarity 0.93; same class and component: true.
- Step 5 done
Sandbox replay
0 msInconclusive: Skipped replay (duplicate)
Treated as a duplicate of r_6y9btspn6v; not replayed so the bounty is not paid twice.
- Step 6 done
Assessment
5.9 sAssessment: Slop assessment 0.20
Version exists and is in scope; no fabricated version or code reference detected Code reference (src/notes.ts, GET /api/notes/:id) did not fail validation Impact is plausible and consistent with the CWE-639 IDOR class Report is terse with no reproduction steps, request/response samples or PoC, so it is unverified rather than fabricated Canary did not reproduce; this alone does not indicate slop
- Step 7 done
Verdict
0 msDuplicateconfidence 93%suggested severity mediumThis looks like a duplicate of r_6y9btspn6v. Same vulnerability class and primary component as r_6y9btspn6v (similarity 0.93), which was already accepted. Confirm before voiding the deposit.
Claude: claude-opus-5-5· the AI recommends; only a maintainer moves money.